Papers › Incorporating physical constraints in a deep probabilistic machine learning framework...

Incorporating physical constraints in a deep probabilistic machine learning framework for coarse-graining dynamical systems

30 Dec 2019arXiv:1912.12976archive 2025-07-28

Sebastian Kaltenbach, Phaedon-Stelios Koutsourelakis

Data-based discovery of effective, coarse-grained (CG) models of high-dimensional dynamical systems presents a unique challenge in computational physics and particularly in the context of multiscale problems. The present paper offers a data-based, probablistic perspective that enables the quantification of predictive uncertainties. One of the outstanding problems has been the introduction of physical constraints in the probabilistic machine learning objectives. The primary utility of such constraints stems from the undisputed physical laws such as conservation of mass, energy etc. that they represent. Furthermore and apart from leading to physically realistic predictions, they can significantly reduce the requisite amount of training data which for high-dimensional, multiscale systems are expensive to obtain (Small Data regime). We formulate the coarse-graining process by employing a probabilistic state-space model and account for the aforementioned equality constraints as virtual observables in the associated densities. We demonstrate how probabilistic inference tools can be employed to identify the coarse-grained variables in combination with deep neural nets and their evolution model without ever needing to define a fine-to-coarse (restriction) projection and without needing time-derivatives of state variables. Furthermore, it is capable of reconstructing the evolution of the full, fine-scale system and therefore the observables of interest need not be selected a priori. We demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework by applying it to systems of interacting particles and an image-series of a nonlinear pendulum.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

10 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 10 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from SebastianKaltenbach/PhysicalConstraints_ProbabilisticCG. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections