Papers › Incorporating External Knowledge through Pre-training for Natural Language to Code Generation

Incorporating External Knowledge through Pre-training for Natural Language to Code Generation

20 Apr 2020ACL 2020 6arXiv:2004.09015archive 2025-07-28

Frank F. Xu, Zhengbao Jiang, Pengcheng Yin, Bogdan Vasilescu, Graham Neubig

Open-domain code generation aims to generate code in a general-purpose programming language (such as Python) from natural language (NL) intents. Motivated by the intuition that developers usually retrieve resources on the web when writing code, we explore the effectiveness of incorporating two varieties of external knowledge into NL-to-code generation: automatically mined NL-code pairs from the online programming QA forum StackOverflow and programming language API documentation. Our evaluations show that combining the two sources with data augmentation and retrieval-based data re-sampling improves the current state-of-the-art by up to 2.2% absolute BLEU score on the code generation testbed CoNaLa. The code and resources are available at https://github.com/neulab/external-knowledge-codegen.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2004.09015")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 5 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 5 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

neulab/external-knowledge-codegen officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchApache-2.0 report
zorazrw/multilingual-conala mentioned on GitHubpytorchCC-BY-SA-4.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

5 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

5unverified

Licence: 0 of the 5 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from neulab/external-knowledge-codegen. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

decode neulab/external-knowledge-codegen/evaluation.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 0bf34988625f82d1 · report
dot_prod_attention neulab/external-knowledge-codegen/model/nn_utils.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 8a2b39c05ccc8ca0 · report
evaluate neulab/external-knowledge-codegen/evaluation.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 3115c02671dad0f4 · report
input_transpose neulab/external-knowledge-codegen/model/nn_utils.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 4d634e9ce2a4f738 · report
length_array_to_mask_tensor neulab/external-knowledge-codegen/model/nn_utils.py official repository unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 4f498904d7930e35 · report

Tasks

Code GenerationData AugmentationRetrieval

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Code Generation CoNaLa External Knowledge With API + Reranking BLEU 32.26 #7 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Code Generation CoNaLa External Knowledge With API BLEU 30.69 #8 of 14 Archive leaderboard report
Code Generation CoNaLa-Ext External Knowledge With API + Reranking BLEU 20.54 #3 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Code Generation CoNaLa-Ext External Knowledge With API BLEU 20.37 #4 of 6 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections