Papers › Incivility Detection in Open Source Code Review and Issue Discussions
Incivility Detection in Open Source Code Review and Issue Discussions
Isabella Ferreira, Ahlaam Rafiq, Jinghui Cheng
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Given the democratic nature of open source development, code review and issue discussions may be uncivil. Incivility, defined as features of discussion that convey an unnecessarily disrespectful tone, can have negative consequences to open source communities. To prevent or minimize these negative consequences, open source platforms have included mechanisms for removing uncivil language from the discussions. However, such approaches require manual inspection, which can be overwhelming given the large number of discussions. To help open source communities deal with this problem, in this paper, we aim to compare six classical machine learning models with BERT to detect incivility in open source code review and issue discussions. Furthermore, we assess if adding contextual information improves the models' performance and how well the models perform in a cross-platform setting. We found that BERT performs better than classical machine learning models, with a best F1-score of 0.95. Furthermore, classical machine learning models tend to underperform to detect non-technical and civil discussions. Our results show that adding the contextual information to BERT did not improve its performance and that none of the analyzed classifiers had an outstanding performance in a cross-platform setting. Finally, we provide insights into the tones that the classifiers misclassify.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections