Papers › Distilling Knowledge by Mimicking Features

Distilling Knowledge by Mimicking Features

3 Nov 2020arXiv:2011.01424archive 2025-07-28

Guo-Hua Wang, Yifan Ge, Jianxin Wu

Knowledge distillation (KD) is a popular method to train efficient networks ("student") with the help of high-capacity networks ("teacher"). Traditional methods use the teacher's soft logits as extra supervision to train the student network. In this paper, we argue that it is more advantageous to make the student mimic the teacher's features in the penultimate layer. Not only the student can directly learn more effective information from the teacher feature, feature mimicking can also be applied for teachers trained without a softmax layer. Experiments show that it can achieve higher accuracy than traditional KD. To further facilitate feature mimicking, we decompose a feature vector into the magnitude and the direction. We argue that the teacher should give more freedom to the student feature's magnitude, and let the student pay more attention on mimicking the feature direction. To meet this requirement, we propose a loss term based on locality-sensitive hashing (LSH). With the help of this new loss, our method indeed mimics feature directions more accurately, relaxes constraints on feature magnitudes, and achieves state-of-the-art distillation accuracy. We provide theoretical analyses of how LSH facilitates feature direction mimicking, and further extend feature mimicking to multi-label recognition and object detection.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2011.01424")

Code

Syntology Ran 5 of 6 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong; 3 ran · fixture could not drive it.

By repository: official repository: 4 samples from 2 repositories, 3 ran; 2 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

DoctorKey/LSHFM.detection officialmentioned on GitHubpytorch report
DoctorKey/LSHFM.multiclassification officialmentioned on GitHubpytorch report
DoctorKey/LSHFM.singleclassification officialmentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 5 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
1ran · our draft was wrong
3ran · fixture could not drive it
1unverified

Licence: 6 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

validate DoctorKey/LSHFM.singleclassification/imagenet_lsh.py official repository ran · honoured contract no licence file found · pointer only · e48a7a2383524bda · report
vis_bbox DoctorKey/LSHFM.detection/src/visual.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it no licence file found · pointer only · 60427af0bdab606c · report
vis_image DoctorKey/LSHFM.detection/src/visual.py official repository ran · fixture could not drive it no licence file found · pointer only · 9975d86336dcfa7e · report
train DoctorKey/LSHFM.singleclassification/imagenet_lsh.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · c1601433df697b2a · report
accuracy identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · fixture could not drive it licence of this copy not recorded · 131a82fd65128218 · report
get_teacher_name identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong licence of this copy not recorded · 4b4f0463521302e8 · report

Tasks

Knowledge DistillationObject Detectionobject-detection

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Knowledge Distillation COCO (Common Objects in Context) LSHFM (T: ResNet101 S: ResNet50) mAP 77.16 #3 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Knowledge Distillation COCO (Common Objects in Context) LSHFM (T: ResNet101 S: MobileNetV2) mAP 73.73 #4 of 4 Archive leaderboard report
Knowledge Distillation ImageNet LSHFM (T: ResNet-34 S:ResNet-18) Top-1 accuracy % 71.72 #40 of 52 Archive leaderboard report
Knowledge Distillation PASCAL VOC LSHFM (T: ResNet101 S: ResNet50) mAP 93.17 #1 of 2 Archive leaderboard report
Knowledge Distillation PASCAL VOC LSHFM (T: ResNet101 S: MobileNetV2) mAP 90.14 #2 of 2 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Softmax

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections