Papers › IMRAM: Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory for Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrieval

IMRAM: Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory for Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrieval

8 Mar 2020CVPR 2020 6arXiv:2003.03772archive 2025-07-28

Hui Chen, Guiguang Ding, Xudong Liu, Zijia Lin, Ji Liu, Jungong Han

Enabling bi-directional retrieval of images and texts is important for understanding the correspondence between vision and language. Existing methods leverage the attention mechanism to explore such correspondence in a fine-grained manner. However, most of them consider all semantics equally and thus align them uniformly, regardless of their diverse complexities. In fact, semantics are diverse (i.e. involving different kinds of semantic concepts), and humans usually follow a latent structure to combine them into understandable languages. It may be difficult to optimally capture such sophisticated correspondences in existing methods. In this paper, to address such a deficiency, we propose an Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory (IMRAM) method, in which correspondences between images and texts are captured with multiple steps of alignments. Specifically, we introduce an iterative matching scheme to explore such fine-grained correspondence progressively. A memory distillation unit is used to refine alignment knowledge from early steps to later ones. Experiment results on three benchmark datasets, i.e. Flickr8K, Flickr30K, and MS COCO, show that our IMRAM achieves state-of-the-art performance, well demonstrating its effectiveness. Experiments on a practical business advertisement dataset, named \Ads{}, further validates the applicability of our method in practical scenarios.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2003.03772")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: official repository: 3 samples from 1 repository, 2 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

HuiChen24/IMRAM officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 2 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2ran · our draft was wrong
1unverified

Licence: 3 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from HuiChen24/IMRAM. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

encode_data HuiChen24/IMRAM/evaluation.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 7ff5ad918339d214 · report
shard_xattn HuiChen24/IMRAM/evaluation.py official repository ran · our draft was wrong no licence file found · pointer only · 23f423f02c60ac8d · report
evalrank HuiChen24/IMRAM/evaluation.py official repository unverified no licence file found · pointer only · ecdf3a2569c46dbb · report

Tasks

Cross-Modal RetrievalImage-text RetrievalRetrievalText Retrieval

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Cross-Modal Retrieval COCO 2014 IMRAM Image-to-text R@1 53.7 #31 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-Modal Retrieval COCO 2014 IMRAM Image-to-text R@10 91.0 #31 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-Modal Retrieval COCO 2014 IMRAM Image-to-text R@5 83.2 #31 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-Modal Retrieval COCO 2014 IMRAM Text-to-image R@1 39.7 #31 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-Modal Retrieval COCO 2014 IMRAM Text-to-image R@10 79.8 #31 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-Modal Retrieval COCO 2014 IMRAM Text-to-image R@5 69.1 #31 of 36 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-Modal Retrieval Flickr30k IMRAM Image-to-text R@1 74.1 #20 of 27 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-Modal Retrieval Flickr30k IMRAM Image-to-text R@10 96.6 #20 of 27 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-Modal Retrieval Flickr30k IMRAM Image-to-text R@5 93.0 #20 of 27 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-Modal Retrieval Flickr30k IMRAM Text-to-image R@1 53.9 #20 of 27 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-Modal Retrieval Flickr30k IMRAM Text-to-image R@10 87.2 #20 of 27 Archive leaderboard report
Cross-Modal Retrieval Flickr30k IMRAM Text-to-image R@5 79.4 #20 of 27 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections