Papers › Improving Vision Transformers by Revisiting High-frequency Components
Improving Vision Transformers by Revisiting High-frequency Components
Jiawang Bai, Li Yuan, Shu-Tao Xia, Shuicheng Yan, Zhifeng Li, Wei Liu
The transformer models have shown promising effectiveness in dealing with various vision tasks. However, compared with training Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models, training Vision Transformer (ViT) models is more difficult and relies on the large-scale training set. To explain this observation we make a hypothesis that \textit{ViT models are less effective in capturing the high-frequency components of images than CNN models}, and verify it by a frequency analysis. Inspired by this finding, we first investigate the effects of existing techniques for improving ViT models from a new frequency perspective, and find that the success of some techniques (e.g., RandAugment) can be attributed to the better usage of the high-frequency components. Then, to compensate for this insufficient ability of ViT models, we propose HAT, which directly augments high-frequency components of images via adversarial training. We show that HAT can consistently boost the performance of various ViT models (e.g., +1.2% for ViT-B, +0.5% for Swin-B), and especially enhance the advanced model VOLO-D5 to 87.3% that only uses ImageNet-1K data, and the superiority can also be maintained on out-of-distribution data and transferred to downstream tasks. The code is available at: https://github.com/jiawangbai/HAT.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2204.00993")
Code
Syntology Ran 10 of 14 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 4 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 10 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 14 samples from 1 repository, 10 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
14 samples harvested; 10 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 14 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from jiawangbai/HAT. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
758bd44a54df5709 · report
d6aec4de1a988995 · report
b10f308ac343586f · report
33ecaec51f88c518 · report
f3cd14e6c18a60d8 · report
0b3e7de2ecb2c1e7 · report
53a133709900d494 · report
f1380508396f9eb9 · report
ba7779c554538760 · report
bcb4ce1c1b25bc6c · report
a114b78025e6c55f · report
2b66fd4ced7843b3 · report
6974cb1ca3926a70 · report
b66088e90761117d · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Generalization | ImageNet-C | VOLO-D5+HAT | Number of params | 296M | #10 of 47 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | ImageNet-C | VOLO-D5+HAT | mean Corruption Error (mCE) | 38.4 | #10 of 47 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | ImageNet-R | VOLO-D5+HAT | Top-1 Error Rate | 40.3 | #16 of 39 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Domain Generalization | Stylized-ImageNet | VOLO-D5+HAT | Top 1 Accuracy | 25.9 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | VOLO-D5+HAT | GFLOPs | 412 | #98 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | VOLO-D5+HAT | Number of params | 295.5M | #98 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | ImageNet | VOLO-D5+HAT | Top 1 Accuracy | 87.3% | #98 of 1060 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections