Papers › Improving the Perturbation-Based Explanation of Deepfake Detectors Through the Use of...

Improving the Perturbation-Based Explanation of Deepfake Detectors Through the Use of Adversarially-Generated Samples

6 Feb 2025arXiv:2502.03957archive 2025-07-28

Konstantinos Tsigos, Evlampios Apostolidis, Vasileios Mezaris

In this paper, we introduce the idea of using adversarially-generated samples of the input images that were classified as deepfakes by a detector, to form perturbation masks for inferring the importance of different input features and produce visual explanations. We generate these samples based on Natural Evolution Strategies, aiming to flip the original deepfake detector's decision and classify these samples as real. We apply this idea to four perturbation-based explanation methods (LIME, SHAP, SOBOL and RISE) and evaluate the performance of the resulting modified methods using a SOTA deepfake detection model, a benchmarking dataset (FaceForensics++) and a corresponding explanation evaluation framework. Our quantitative assessments document the mostly positive contribution of the proposed perturbation approach in the performance of explanation methods. Our qualitative analysis shows the capacity of the modified explanation methods to demarcate the manipulated image regions more accurately, and thus to provide more useful explanations.

PaperPDFCode

Code

IDT-ITI/Adv-XAI-Deepfakes officialmentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

BenchmarkingDeepFake DetectionFace Swapping

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

FLIPSHAP

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections