Papers › Improving the Coverage and the Generalization Ability of Neural Word Sense...

Improving the Coverage and the Generalization Ability of Neural Word Sense Disambiguation through Hypernymy and Hyponymy Relationships

2 Nov 2018arXiv:1811.00960archive 2025-07-28

Loïc Vial, Benjamin Lecouteux, Didier Schwab

In Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD), the predominant approach generally involves a supervised system trained on sense annotated corpora. The limited quantity of such corpora however restricts the coverage and the performance of these systems. In this article, we propose a new method that solves these issues by taking advantage of the knowledge present in WordNet, and especially the hypernymy and hyponymy relationships between synsets, in order to reduce the number of different sense tags that are necessary to disambiguate all words of the lexical database. Our method leads to state of the art results on most WSD evaluation tasks, while improving the coverage of supervised systems, reducing the training time and the size of the models, without additional training data. In addition, we exhibit results that significantly outperform the state of the art when our method is combined with an ensembling technique and the addition of the WordNet Gloss Tagged as training corpus.

PaperPDF

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Word Sense Disambiguation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Word Sense Disambiguation SemEval 2007 Task 17 SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble F1 66.81 #2 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Word Sense Disambiguation SemEval 2007 Task 7 SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble F1 86.02 #2 of 10 Archive leaderboard report
Word Sense Disambiguation SemEval 2013 Task 12 SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble F1 72.63 #2 of 12 Archive leaderboard report
Word Sense Disambiguation SemEval 2015 Task 13 SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble F1 74.46 #2 of 6 Archive leaderboard report
Word Sense Disambiguation SensEval 2 SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble F1 75.15 #2 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Word Sense Disambiguation SensEval 3 Task 1 SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble F1 70.11 #7 of 11 Archive leaderboard report
Word Sense Disambiguation Supervised: SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble SemEval 2007 66.81 #17 of 27 Archive leaderboard report
Word Sense Disambiguation Supervised: SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble SemEval 2013 72.63 #17 of 27 Archive leaderboard report
Word Sense Disambiguation Supervised: SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble SemEval 2015 74.46 #17 of 27 Archive leaderboard report
Word Sense Disambiguation Supervised: SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble Senseval 2 75.15 #17 of 27 Archive leaderboard report
Word Sense Disambiguation Supervised: SemCor+WNGT, vocabulary reduced, ensemble Senseval 3 70.11 #17 of 27 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections