Papers › Improving the Accuracy of Pre-trained Word Embeddings for Sentiment Analysis
Improving the Accuracy of Pre-trained Word Embeddings for Sentiment Analysis
Seyed Mahdi Rezaeinia, Ali Ghodsi, Rouhollah Rahmani
Sentiment analysis is one of the well-known tasks and fast growing research areas in natural language processing (NLP) and text classifications. This technique has become an essential part of a wide range of applications including politics, business, advertising and marketing. There are various techniques for sentiment analysis, but recently word embeddings methods have been widely used in sentiment classification tasks. Word2Vec and GloVe are currently among the most accurate and usable word embedding methods which can convert words into meaningful vectors. However, these methods ignore sentiment information of texts and need a huge corpus of texts for training and generating exact vectors which are used as inputs of deep learning models. As a result, because of the small size of some corpuses, researcher often have to use pre-trained word embeddings which were trained on other large text corpus such as Google News with about 100 billion words. The increasing accuracy of pre-trained word embeddings has a great impact on sentiment analysis research. In this paper we propose a novel method, Improved Word Vectors (IWV), which increases the accuracy of pre-trained word embeddings in sentiment analysis. Our method is based on Part-of-Speech (POS) tagging techniques, lexicon-based approaches and Word2Vec/GloVe methods. We tested the accuracy of our method via different deep learning models and sentiment datasets. Our experiment results show that Improved Word Vectors (IWV) are very effective for sentiment analysis.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections