Papers › Improving Neural Abstractive Document Summarization with Explicit Information...

Improving Neural Abstractive Document Summarization with Explicit Information Selection Modeling

1 Oct 2018EMNLP 2018 10archive 2025-07-28

Wei Li, Xinyan Xiao, Yajuan Lyu, Yuanzhuo Wang

Information selection is the most important component in document summarization task. In this paper, we propose to extend the basic neural encoding-decoding framework with an information selection layer to explicitly model and optimize the information selection process in abstractive document summarization. Specifically, our information selection layer consists of two parts: gated global information filtering and local sentence selection. Unnecessary information in the original document is first globally filtered, then salient sentences are selected locally while generating each summary sentence sequentially. To optimize the information selection process directly, distantly-supervised training guided by the golden summary is also imported. Experimental results demonstrate that the explicit modeling and optimizing of the information selection process improves document summarization performance significantly, which enables our model to generate more informative and concise summaries, and thus significantly outperform state-of-the-art neural abstractive methods.

PaperPDF

Code

No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Abstractive Text SummarizationDocument SummarizationMachine TranslationSentenceText Generation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Abstractive Text Summarization CNN / Daily Mail Li et al. ROUGE-1 41.54 #32 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Abstractive Text Summarization CNN / Daily Mail Li et al. ROUGE-2 18.18 #32 of 53 Archive leaderboard report
Abstractive Text Summarization CNN / Daily Mail Li et al. ROUGE-L 36.47 #32 of 53 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections