Papers › Improving Merge Sort and Quick Sort Performance by Utilizing Alphadev's Sorting...
Improving Merge Sort and Quick Sort Performance by Utilizing Alphadev's Sorting Networks as Base Cases
Anas Gamal Aly, Anders E. Jensen, Hala ElAarag
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Recent work by Google DeepMind introduced assembly-optimized sorting networks that achieve faster performance for small fixed-size arrays (3-8). In this research, we investigate the integration of these networks as base cases in classical divide-and-conquer sorting algorithms, specifically Merge Sort and Quick Sort, to leverage these efficient sorting networks for small subarrays generated during the recursive process. We conducted benchmarks with 11 different optimization configurations and compared them to classical Merge Sort and Quick Sort. We tested the configurations with random, sorted and nearly sorted arrays. Our optimized Merge Sort, using a configuration of three sorting networks (sizes 6, 7, and 8), achieves at least 1.5x speedup for random and nearly sorted arrays, and at least 2x speedup for sorted arrays, in comparison to classical Merge Sort. This optimized Merge Sort surpasses both classical Quick Sort and similarly optimized Quick Sort variants when sorting random arrays of size 10,000 and larger. When comparing our optimized Quick Sort to classical Quick Sort, we observe a 1.5x speedup using the 3-to-5 configuration on sorted arrays of size 10,000. The 6-to-8 configuration maintains a consistent 1.5x improvement across sorted arrays from 25,000 to 1 million elements. Our findings demonstrate the potential of integrating AI-optimized sorting networks to enhance the performance of classical sorting algorithms.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections