Papers › Improving few-shot learning-based protein engineering with evolutionary sampling
Improving few-shot learning-based protein engineering with evolutionary sampling
M. Zaki Jawaid, Robin W. Yeo, Aayushma Gautam, T. Blair Gainous, Daniel O. Hart, Timothy P. Daley
Designing novel functional proteins remains a slow and expensive process due to a variety of protein engineering challenges; in particular, the number of protein variants that can be experimentally tested in a given assay pales in comparison to the vastness of the overall sequence space, resulting in low hit rates and expensive wet lab testing cycles. In this paper, we propose a few-shot learning approach to novel protein design that aims to accelerate the expensive wet lab testing cycle and is capable of leveraging a training dataset that is both small and skewed (≈10⁵ datapoints, < 1% positive hits). Our approach is composed of two parts: a semi-supervised transfer learning approach to generate a discrete fitness landscape for a desired protein function and a novel evolutionary Monte Carlo Markov Chain sampling algorithm to more efficiently explore the fitness landscape. We demonstrate the performance of our approach by experimentally screening predicted high fitness gene activators, resulting in a dramatically improved hit rate compared to existing methods. Our method can be easily adapted to other protein engineering and design problems, particularly where the cost associated with obtaining labeled data is significantly high. We have provided open source code for our method at https:// github.com/SuperSecretBioTech/evolutionary_monte_carlo_search.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections