Papers › Improving exponential-family random graph models for bipartite networks

Improving exponential-family random graph models for bipartite networks

3 Feb 2025arXiv:2502.01892links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Alex Stivala, Peng Wang, Alessandro Lomi

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Bipartite graphs, representing two-mode networks, arise in many research fields. These networks have two disjoint node sets representing distinct entity types, for example persons and groups, with edges representing associations between the two entity types. In bipartite graphs, the smallest possible cycle is a cycle of length four, and hence four-cycles are the smallest structure to model closure in such networks. Exponential-family random graph models (ERGMs) are a widely used model for social, and other, networks, including specifically bipartite networks. Existing ERGM terms to model four-cycles in bipartite networks, however, are relatively rarely used. In this work we demonstrate some problems with these existing terms to model four-cycles, and define new ERGM terms to help overcome these problems. The position of the new terms in the ERGM dependence hierarchy, and their interpretation, is discussed. The new terms are demonstrated in simulation experiments, and their application illustrated on a canonical example of an empirical two-mode network.

PaperPDFCode

Code

stivalaa/EstimNetDirected officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections