Papers › Improving Deep Learning for HAR with shallow LSTMs

Improving Deep Learning for HAR with shallow LSTMs

2 Aug 2021arXiv:2108.00702archive 2025-07-28

Marius Bock, Alexander Hoelzemann, Michael Moeller, Kristof Van Laerhoven

Recent studies in Human Activity Recognition (HAR) have shown that Deep Learning methods are able to outperform classical Machine Learning algorithms. One popular Deep Learning architecture in HAR is the DeepConvLSTM. In this paper we propose to alter the DeepConvLSTM architecture to employ a 1-layered instead of a 2-layered LSTM. We validate our architecture change on 5 publicly available HAR datasets by comparing the predictive performance with and without the change employing varying hidden units within the LSTM layer(s). Results show that across all datasets, our architecture consistently improves on the original one: Recognition performance increases up to 11.7% for the F1-score, and our architecture significantly decreases the amount of learnable parameters. This improvement over DeepConvLSTM decreases training time by as much as 48%. Our results stand in contrast to the belief that one needs at least a 2-layered LSTM when dealing with sequential data. Based on our results we argue that said claim might not be applicable to sensor-based HAR.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

mariusbock/dl-for-har officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Activity RecognitionDeep LearningHuman Activity Recognition

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

LSTM

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections