Papers › Improved User Identification through Calibrated Monte-Carlo Dropout
Improved User Identification through Calibrated Monte-Carlo Dropout
Rouhollah Ahmadian, Mehdi Ghatee, Johan Wahlström
This paper presents an enhanced approach to user identification using smartphone and wearable sensor data. Our methodology involves segmenting input data and independently analyzing subsequences with CNNs. During testing, we apply calibrated Monte-Carlo Dropout to measure prediction uncertainty. By leveraging the weights obtained from uncertainty quantification, we integrate the results through weighted averaging, thereby improving overall identification accuracy. The main motivation behind this paper is the need to calibrate the CNN for improved weighted averaging. It has been observed that incorrect predictions often receive high confidence, while correct predictions are assigned lower confidence. To tackle this issue, we have implemented the Ensemble of Near Isotonic Regression (ENIR) as an advanced calibration technique. This ensures that certainty scores more accurately reflect the true likelihood of correctness. Furthermore, our experiment shows that calibrating CNN reduces the need for Monte Carlo samples in uncertainty quantification, thereby reducing computational costs. Our thorough evaluation and comparison of different calibration methods have shown improved accuracy in user identification across multiple datasets. Our results showed notable performance improvements when compared to the latest models available. In particular, our approach achieved better results than DB2 by 1.12% and HAR by 0.3% in accuracy.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections