Papers › Improve Deep Forest with Learnable Layerwise Augmentation Policy Schedule

Improve Deep Forest with Learnable Layerwise Augmentation Policy Schedule

16 Sep 2023arXiv:2309.09030archive 2025-07-28

Hongyu Zhu, Sichu Liang, Wentao Hu, Fang-Qi Li, Yali Yuan, Shi-Lin Wang, Guang Cheng

As a modern ensemble technique, Deep Forest (DF) employs a cascading structure to construct deep models, providing stronger representational power compared to traditional decision forests. However, its greedy multi-layer learning procedure is prone to overfitting, limiting model effectiveness and generalizability. This paper presents an optimized Deep Forest, featuring learnable, layerwise data augmentation policy schedules. Specifically, We introduce the Cut Mix for Tabular data (CMT) augmentation technique to mitigate overfitting and develop a population-based search algorithm to tailor augmentation intensity for each layer. Additionally, we propose to incorporate outputs from intermediate layers into a checkpoint ensemble for more stable performance. Experimental results show that our method sets new state-of-the-art (SOTA) benchmarks in various tabular classification tasks, outperforming shallow tree ensembles, deep forests, deep neural network, and AutoML competitors. The learned policies also transfer effectively to Deep Forest variants, underscoring its potential for enhancing non-differentiable deep learning modules in tabular signal processing.

PaperPDFCode

Code

dbsxfz/augdf officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

AutoMLData Augmentationtabular-classification

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections