Papers › Imprecise Label Learning: A Unified Framework for Learning with Various Imprecise...

Imprecise Label Learning: A Unified Framework for Learning with Various Imprecise Label Configurations

22 May 2023arXiv:2305.12715archive 2025-07-28

Hao Chen, Ankit Shah, Jindong Wang, Ran Tao, Yidong Wang, Xing Xie, Masashi Sugiyama, Rita Singh, Bhiksha Raj

Learning with reduced labeling standards, such as noisy label, partial label, and multiple label candidates, which we generically refer to as \textit{imprecise} labels, is a commonplace challenge in machine learning tasks. Previous methods tend to propose specific designs for every emerging imprecise label configuration, which is usually unsustainable when multiple configurations of imprecision coexist. In this paper, we introduce imprecise label learning (ILL), a framework for the unification of learning with various imprecise label configurations. ILL leverages expectation-maximization (EM) for modeling the imprecise label information, treating the precise labels as latent variables.Instead of approximating the correct labels for training, it considers the entire distribution of all possible labeling entailed by the imprecise information. We demonstrate that ILL can seamlessly adapt to partial label learning, semi-supervised learning, noisy label learning, and, more importantly, a mixture of these settings. Notably, ILL surpasses the existing specified techniques for handling imprecise labels, marking the first unified framework with robust and effective performance across various challenging settings. We hope our work will inspire further research on this topic, unleashing the full potential of ILL in wider scenarios where precise labels are expensive and complicated to obtain.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

hhhhhhao/general-framework-weak-supervision officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Learning with noisy labelsPartial Label Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-100N ILL Accuracy (mean) 65.84 #7 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Aggregate ILL Accuracy (mean) 95.47 #5 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random1 ILL Accuracy (mean) 94.85 #5 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random2 ILL Accuracy (mean) 95.04 #3 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random3 ILL Accuracy (mean) 95.13 #3 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Worst ILL Accuracy (mean) 93.58 #4 of 25 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels Clothing1M ILL Test Accuracy 74.02 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels mini WebVision 1.0 ILL Top 1 Accuracy 79.37 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Partial Label Learning CIFAR-10 (partial ratio 0.1) ILL Accuracy 96.37 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Partial Label Learning CIFAR-10 (partial ratio 0.3) ILL Accuracy 96.26 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Partial Label Learning CIFAR-10 (partial ratio 0.5) ILL Accuracy 95.91 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Partial Label Learning CIFAR-100 (partial ratio 0.01) ILL Accuracy 75.31 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Partial Label Learning CIFAR-100 (partial ratio 0.05) ILL Accuracy 74.58 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Partial Label Learning CIFAR-100 (partial ratio 0.1) ILL Accuracy 74 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report
Partial Label Learning Caltech-UCSD Birds 200 (partial ratio 0.05) ILL Accuracy 70.77 #1 of 1 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections