Papers › Importance Reweighting for Biquality Learning

Importance Reweighting for Biquality Learning

19 Oct 2020arXiv:2010.09621archive 2025-07-28

Pierre Nodet, Vincent Lemaire, Alexis Bondu, Antoine Cornuéjols

The field of Weakly Supervised Learning (WSL) has recently seen a surge of popularity, with numerous papers addressing different types of "supervision deficiencies", namely: poor quality, non adaptability, and insufficient quantity of labels. Regarding quality, label noise can be of different types, including completely-at-random, at-random or even not-at-random. All these kinds of label noise are addressed separately in the literature, leading to highly specialized approaches. This paper proposes an original, encompassing, view of Weakly Supervised Learning, which results in the design of generic approaches capable of dealing with any kind of label noise. For this purpose, an alternative setting called "Biquality data" is used. It assumes that a small trusted dataset of correctly labeled examples is available, in addition to an untrusted dataset of noisy examples. In this paper, we propose a new reweigthing scheme capable of identifying noncorrupted examples in the untrusted dataset. This allows one to learn classifiers using both datasets. Extensive experiments that simulate several types of label noise and that vary the quality and quantity of untrusted examples, demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms baselines and state-of-the-art approaches.

PaperPDFCode

Code

pierrenodet/irbl officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Weakly-supervised Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections