Papers › IDiff-Face: Synthetic-based Face Recognition through Fizzy Identity-Conditioned...
IDiff-Face: Synthetic-based Face Recognition through Fizzy Identity-Conditioned Diffusion Models
Fadi Boutros, Jonas Henry Grebe, Arjan Kuijper, Naser Damer
The availability of large-scale authentic face databases has been crucial to the significant advances made in face recognition research over the past decade. However, legal and ethical concerns led to the recent retraction of many of these databases by their creators, raising questions about the continuity of future face recognition research without one of its key resources. Synthetic datasets have emerged as a promising alternative to privacy-sensitive authentic data for face recognition development. However, recent synthetic datasets that are used to train face recognition models suffer either from limitations in intra-class diversity or cross-class (identity) discrimination, leading to less optimal accuracies, far away from the accuracies achieved by models trained on authentic data. This paper targets this issue by proposing IDiff-Face, a novel approach based on conditional latent diffusion models for synthetic identity generation with realistic identity variations for face recognition training. Through extensive evaluations, our proposed synthetic-based face recognition approach pushed the limits of state-of-the-art performances, achieving, for example, 98.00% accuracy on the Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW) benchmark, far ahead from the recent synthetic-based face recognition solutions with 95.40% and bridging the gap to authentic-based face recognition with 99.82% accuracy.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2308.04995")
Code
Syntology Ran 19 of 21 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 15 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 21 samples from 1 repository, 19 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
21 samples harvested; 19 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 21 of the 21 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from fdbtrs/IDiff-Face. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
08aa093fe6257c67 · report
37111f89a7fe93fa · report
695b655d8de6ed26 · report
605d9b3167169c2e · report
158bf4c3a5f11f04 · report
9fd654ad680f6c6e · report
29df79c9fdb0cee8 · report
be7e40142c49c8be · report
2829b5bb7396d631 · report
4c9000726845f1ba · report
c54fea429589425d · report
b88b129a2a5573a0 · report
16e292649a23697f · report
eafe630ea558977d · report
01343ad27376586e · report
b6b73254ed2be118 · report
f6be833ba409926f · report
dd12981b28dec323 · report
a3986dc0bf43991e · report
73cecca9f3575f09 · report
318ed28c665f6714 · report
Tasks
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synthetic Face Recognition | AgeDB-30 | IDiff-Face | Accuracy | 0.8643 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Synthetic Face Recognition | CALFW | IDiff-Face | Accuracy | 0.9065 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Synthetic Face Recognition | CFP-FP | IDiff-Face | Accuracy | 0.8547 | #3 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Synthetic Face Recognition | CPLFW | IDiff-Face | Accuracy | 0.8045 | #3 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Synthetic Face Recognition | LFW | IDiff-Face | Accuracy | 0.98 | #2 of 3 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections