Papers › Identifying Visible Actions in Lifestyle Vlogs

Identifying Visible Actions in Lifestyle Vlogs

10 Jun 2019ACL 2019 7arXiv:1906.04236archive 2025-07-28

Oana Ignat, Laura Burdick, Jia Deng, Rada Mihalcea

We consider the task of identifying human actions visible in online videos. We focus on the widely spread genre of lifestyle vlogs, which consist of videos of people performing actions while verbally describing them. Our goal is to identify if actions mentioned in the speech description of a video are visually present. We construct a dataset with crowdsourced manual annotations of visible actions, and introduce a multimodal algorithm that leverages information derived from visual and linguistic clues to automatically infer which actions are visible in a video. We demonstrate that our multimodal algorithm outperforms algorithms based only on one modality at a time.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1906.04236")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 11 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 11 have no recorded run.

By repository: official repository: 11 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

MichiganNLP/vlog_action_recognition officialmentioned on GitHubtfMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

11 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 11 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

11unverified

Licence: 0 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from MichiganNLP/vlog_action_recognition. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

agreement_total MichiganNLP/vlog_action_recognition/amt/compute_agreement.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · add9845de22feb70 · report
build_dense_model MichiganNLP/vlog_action_recognition/classify/main_model.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · f634d81b68c16596 · report
compare_with_GT MichiganNLP/vlog_action_recognition/amt/detect_spam.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 3015fc5f426cd562 · report
compute_agreement MichiganNLP/vlog_action_recognition/amt/read_csv_results.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 633a98e67cf8f4f7 · report
compute_ratings MichiganNLP/vlog_action_recognition/amt/compute_agreement.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · ef2f2d82063b646a · report
create_model_concat MichiganNLP/vlog_action_recognition/classify/main_model.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 1a9424d013afe82b · report
fleiss_kappa MichiganNLP/vlog_action_recognition/amt/compute_agreement.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 69de3cbbda85c060 · report
getLength MichiganNLP/vlog_action_recognition/amt/read_csv_results.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 8538771bd1dd8a7d · report
get_compromised_hits MichiganNLP/vlog_action_recognition/amt/detect_spam.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 8aec1885fd917bd9 · report
read_results_from_AMT MichiganNLP/vlog_action_recognition/amt/read_csv_results.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · dad39214a8dcfe23 · report
read_results_from_amt MichiganNLP/vlog_action_recognition/amt/read_AMT.py official repository unverified MIT (permissive) · 872bab173b6ed8cc · report

Tasks

Action Detection

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

IfAct

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections