Papers › Identifying Important Pairwise Logratios in Compositional Data with Sparse Principal...
Identifying Important Pairwise Logratios in Compositional Data with Sparse Principal Component Analysis
Viktorie Nesrstová, Ines Wilms, Karel Hron, Peter Filzmoser
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Compositional data are characterized by the fact that their elemental information is contained in simple pairwise logratios of the parts that constitute the composition. While pairwise logratios are typically easy to interpret, the number of possible pairs to consider quickly becomes (too) large even for medium-sized compositions, which might hinder interpretability in further multivariate analyses. Sparse methods can therefore be useful to identify few, important pairwise logratios (respectively parts contained in them) from the total candidate set. To this end, we propose a procedure based on the construction of all possible pairwise logratios and employ sparse principal component analysis to identify important pairwise logratios. The performance of the procedure is demonstrated both with simulated and real-world data. In our empirical analyses, we propose three visual tools showing (i) the balance between sparsity and explained variability, (ii) stability of the pairwise logratios, and (iii) importance of the original compositional parts to aid practitioners with their model interpretation.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections