Papers › Human-Robot Gym: Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning in Human-Robot Collaboration
Human-Robot Gym: Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning in Human-Robot Collaboration
Jakob Thumm, Felix Trost, Matthias Althoff
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has shown promising results in robot motion planning with first attempts in human-robot collaboration (HRC). However, a fair comparison of RL approaches in HRC under the constraint of guaranteed safety is yet to be made. We, therefore, present human-robot gym, a benchmark suite for safe RL in HRC. Our benchmark suite provides eight challenging, realistic HRC tasks in a modular simulation framework. Most importantly, human-robot gym includes a safety shield that provably guarantees human safety. We are, thereby, the first to provide a benchmark suite to train RL agents that adhere to the safety specifications of real-world HRC. This bridges a critical gap between theoretic RL research and its real-world deployment. Our evaluation of six tasks led to three key results: (a) the diverse nature of the tasks offered by human-robot gym creates a challenging benchmark for state-of-the-art RL methods, (b) incorporating expert knowledge in RL training in the form of an action-based reward can outperform the expert, and (c) our agents negligibly overfit to training data.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections