Papers › Reward Shaping for Human Learning via Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Reward Shaping for Human Learning via Inverse Reinforcement Learning

25 Feb 2020arXiv:2002.10904archive 2025-07-28

Mark A. Rucker, Layne T. Watson, Matthew S. Gerber, Laura E. Barnes

Humans are spectacular reinforcement learners, constantly learning from and adjusting to experience and feedback. Unfortunately, this doesn't necessarily mean humans are fast learners. When tasks are challenging, learning can become unacceptably slow. Fortunately, humans do not have to learn tabula rasa, and learning speed can be greatly increased with learning aids. In this work we validate a new type of learning aid -- reward shaping for humans via inverse reinforcement learning (IRL). The goal of this aid is to increase the speed with which humans can learn good policies for specific tasks. Furthermore this approach compliments alternative machine learning techniques such as safety features that try to prevent individuals from making poor decisions. To achieve our results we first extend a well known IRL algorithm via kernel methods. Afterwards we conduct two human subjects experiments using an online game where players have limited time to learn a good policy. We show with statistical significance that players who receive our learning aid are able to approach desired policies more quickly than the control group.

PaperPDFCode

Code

mrucker/kpirl-kla officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Reinforcement LearningReinforcement Learning (RL)reinforcement-learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections