Papers › HPI-DHC at TREC 2018 Precision Medicine Track
HPI-DHC at TREC 2018 Precision Medicine Track
Michel Oleynik, Erik Faessler, Ariane Morassi Sasso, Arpita Kappattanavar, Benjamin Bergner, Harry Freitas da Cruz, Jan-Philipp Sachs, Suparno Datta, Erwin Bottinger
The TREC-PM challenge aims for advances in the field of information retrieval applied to precision medicine. Here we describe our experimental setup and the achieved results in its 2018 edition. We explored the use of unsupervised topic models, supervised document classification, and rule-based query-time search term boosting and expansion. We participated in the biomedical articles and clinical trials subtasks and were among the three highest-scoring teams. Our results showed that query expansion associated with hand-crafted rules contribute to better values of information retrieval metrics. However, the use of a precision medicine classifier did not show the expected improvement for the biomedical abstracts subtask. In the future, we plan to add different terminologies to replace hand-crafted rules and experiment with negation detection.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Information Retrieval | TREC-PM | hpipubcommon | infNDCG | 0.5605 | #1 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Information Retrieval | TREC-PM | hpictall | infNDCG | 0.5545 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections