Papers › How Players Play Games: Observing the Influences of Game Mechanics
How Players Play Games: Observing the Influences of Game Mechanics
Philipp Moll, Veit Frick, Natascha Rauscher, Mathias Lux
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
The popularity of computer games is remarkably high and is still growing every year. Despite this popularity and the economical importance of gaming, research in game design, or to be more precise, of game mechanics that can be used to improve the enjoyment of a game, is still scarce. In this paper, we analyze Fortnite, one of the currently most successful games, and observe how players play the game. We investigate what makes playing the game enjoyable by analyzing video streams of experienced players from game streaming platforms and by conducting a user study with players who are new to the game. We formulate four hypotheses about how game mechanics influence the way players interact with the game and how it influences player enjoyment. We present differences in player behavior between experienced players and beginners and discuss how game mechanics could be used to improve the enjoyment for beginners. In addition, we describe our approach to analyze games without access to game-internal data by using a toolchain which automatically extracts game information from video streams.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections