Papers › How often does a cubic hypersurface have a rational point?

How often does a cubic hypersurface have a rational point?

10 May 2024arXiv:2405.06584links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Lea Beneish, Christopher Keyes

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

A cubic hypersurface in ℙⁿ defined over ℚ is given by the vanishing locus of a cubic form f in n+1 variables. It is conjectured that when n ≥4, such cubic hypersurfaces satisfy the Hasse principle. This is now known to hold on average due to recent work of Browning, Le Boudec, and Sawin. Using this result, we determine the proportion of cubic hypersurfaces in ℙⁿ, ordered by the height of f, with a rational point for n ≥4 explicitly as a product over primes p of rational functions in p. In particular, this proportion is equal to 1 for cubic hypersurfaces in ℙⁿ for n ≥9; for 100% of cubic hypersurfaces, this recovers a celebrated result of Heath-Brown that non-singular cubic forms in at least 10 variables have rational zeros. In the n=3 case, we give a precise conjecture for the proportion of cubic surfaces in ℙ³ with a rational point.

PaperPDFCode

Code

c-keyes/cubic-hypersurfaces officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections