Papers › Honeyquest: Rapidly Measuring the Enticingness of Cyber Deception Techniques with...
Honeyquest: Rapidly Measuring the Enticingness of Cyber Deception Techniques with Code-based Questionnaires
Mario Kahlhofer, Stefan Achleitner, Stefan Rass, René Mayrhofer
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Fooling adversaries with traps such as honeytokens can slow down cyber attacks and create strong indicators of compromise. Unfortunately, cyber deception techniques are often poorly specified. Also, realistically measuring their effectiveness requires a well-exposed software system together with a production-ready implementation of these techniques. This makes rapid prototyping challenging. Our work translates 13 previously researched and 12 self-defined techniques into a high-level, machine-readable specification. Our open-source tool, Honeyquest, allows researchers to quickly evaluate the enticingness of deception techniques without implementing them. We test the enticingness of 25 cyber deception techniques and 19 true security risks in an experiment with 47 humans. We successfully replicate the goals of previous work with many consistent findings, but without a time-consuming implementation of these techniques on real computer systems. We provide valuable insights for the design of enticing deception and also show that the presence of cyber deception can significantly reduce the risk that adversaries will find a true security risk by about 22% on average.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections