Papers › Homophily-adjusted social influence estimation

Homophily-adjusted social influence estimation

28 May 2024arXiv:2405.18413links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Hanh T. D. Pham, Daniel K. Sewell

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Homophily and social influence are two key concepts of social network analysis. Distinguishing between these phenomena is difficult, and approaches to disambiguate the two have been primarily limited to longitudinal data analyses. In this study, we provide sufficient conditions for valid estimation of social influence through cross-sectional data, leading to a novel homophily-adjusted social influence model which addresses the backdoor pathway of latent homophilic features. The oft-used network autocorrelation model (NAM) is the special case of our proposed model with no latent homophily, suggesting that the NAM is only valid when all homophilic attributes are observed. We conducted an extensive simulation study to evaluate the performance of our proposed homophily-adjusted model, comparing its results with those from the conventional NAM. Our findings shed light on the nuanced dynamics of social networks, presenting a valuable tool for researchers seeking to estimate the effects of social influence while accounting for homophily. Code to implement our approach is available at https://github.com/hanhtdpham/hanam.

PaperPDFCode

Code

hanhtdpham/hanam officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections