Papers › HomoGCL: Rethinking Homophily in Graph Contrastive Learning

HomoGCL: Rethinking Homophily in Graph Contrastive Learning

16 Jun 2023arXiv:2306.09614archive 2025-07-28

Wen-Zhi Li, Chang-Dong Wang, Hui Xiong, Jian-Huang Lai

Contrastive learning (CL) has become the de-facto learning paradigm in self-supervised learning on graphs, which generally follows the "augmenting-contrasting" learning scheme. However, we observe that unlike CL in computer vision domain, CL in graph domain performs decently even without augmentation. We conduct a systematic analysis of this phenomenon and argue that homophily, i.e., the principle that "like attracts like", plays a key role in the success of graph CL. Inspired to leverage this property explicitly, we propose HomoGCL, a model-agnostic framework to expand the positive set using neighbor nodes with neighbor-specific significances. Theoretically, HomoGCL introduces a stricter lower bound of the mutual information between raw node features and node embeddings in augmented views. Furthermore, HomoGCL can be combined with existing graph CL models in a plug-and-play way with light extra computational overhead. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HomoGCL yields multiple state-of-the-art results across six public datasets and consistently brings notable performance improvements when applied to various graph CL methods. Code is avilable at https://github.com/wenzhilics/HomoGCL.

PaperPDFCode

Code

wenzhilics/homogcl officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Contrastive LearningSelf-Supervised Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections