Papers › Holographic Embeddings of Knowledge Graphs
Holographic Embeddings of Knowledge Graphs
Maximilian Nickel, Lorenzo Rosasco, Tomaso Poggio
Learning embeddings of entities and relations is an efficient and versatile method to perform machine learning on relational data such as knowledge graphs. In this work, we propose holographic embeddings (HolE) to learn compositional vector space representations of entire knowledge graphs. The proposed method is related to holographic models of associative memory in that it employs circular correlation to create compositional representations. By using correlation as the compositional operator HolE can capture rich interactions but simultaneously remains efficient to compute, easy to train, and scalable to very large datasets. In extensive experiments we show that holographic embeddings are able to outperform state-of-the-art methods for link prediction in knowledge graphs and relational learning benchmark datasets.
In Syntology View this paper on Syntology: its repositories, every harvested function with whether it ran, its licence and the call to fetch it.
Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1510.04935")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 8 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 8 have no recorded run.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 8 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
8 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 8 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 8 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from mnick/scikit-kge. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
a1ff90bb8c12b9e2 · report
f1c91ce2de33bcff · report
a5d1dd76b77390ab · report
f8afbc7c95eb51e8 · report
a590708a90bcec18 · report
9c11469e31d9e3d1 · report
c50decfd17e5027a · report
0a1271415524bf30 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Link Prediction | FB15k | HolE | Hits@1 | 0.402 | #9 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Link Prediction | FB15k | HolE | Hits@10 | 0.739 | #9 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Link Prediction | FB15k | HolE | Hits@3 | 0.613 | #9 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Link Prediction | FB15k | HolE | MRR | 0.524 | #9 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Link Prediction | WN18 | HolE | Hits@1 | 0.930 | #21 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Link Prediction | WN18 | HolE | Hits@10 | 0.949 | #21 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Link Prediction | WN18 | HolE | Hits@3 | 0.945 | #21 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Link Prediction | WN18 | HolE | MRR | 0.938 | #21 of 37 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections