Papers › Hindsight Goal Ranking on Replay Buffer for Sparse Reward Environment

Hindsight Goal Ranking on Replay Buffer for Sparse Reward Environment

28 Oct 2021arXiv:2110.15043archive 2025-07-28

Tung M. Luu, Chang D. Yoo

This paper proposes a method for prioritizing the replay experience referred to as Hindsight Goal Ranking (HGR) in overcoming the limitation of Hindsight Experience Replay (HER) that generates hindsight goals based on uniform sampling. HGR samples with higher probability on the states visited in an episode with larger temporal difference (TD) error, which is considered as a proxy measure of the amount which the RL agent can learn from an experience. The actual sampling for large TD error is performed in two steps: first, an episode is sampled from the relay buffer according to the average TD error of its experiences, and then, for the sampled episode, the hindsight goal leading to larger TD error is sampled with higher probability from future visited states. The proposed method combined with Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), an off-policy model-free actor-critic algorithm, accelerates learning significantly faster than that without any prioritization on four challenging simulated robotic manipulation tasks. The empirical results show that HGR uses samples more efficiently than previous methods across all tasks.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

tunglm2203/hgr officialtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Experience Replay

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections