Papers › HIH: Towards More Accurate Face Alignment via Heatmap in Heatmap
HIH: Towards More Accurate Face Alignment via Heatmap in Heatmap
Xing Lan, Qinghao Hu, Qiang Chen, Jian Xue, Jian Cheng
Heatmap-based regression overcomes the lack of spatial and contextual information of direct coordinate regression, and has revolutionized the task of face alignment. Yet it suffers from quantization errors caused by neglecting subpixel coordinates in image resizing and network downsampling. In this paper, we first quantitatively analyze the quantization error on benchmarks, which accounts for more than 1/3 of the whole prediction errors for state-of-the-art methods. To tackle this problem, we propose a novel Heatmap In Heatmap(HIH) representation and a coordinate soft-classification (CSC) method, which are seamlessly integrated into the classic hourglass network. The HIH representation utilizes nested heatmaps to jointly represent the coordinate label: one heatmap called integer heatmap stands for the integer coordinate, and the other heatmap named decimal heatmap represents the subpixel coordinate. The range of a decimal heatmap makes up one pixel in the corresponding integer heatmap. Besides, we transfer the offset regression problem to an interval classification task, and CSC regards the confidence of the pixel as the probability of the interval. Meanwhile, CSC applying the distribution loss leverage the soft labels generated from the Gaussian distribution function to guide the offset heatmap training, which makes it easier to learn the distribution of coordinate offsets. Extensive experiments on challenging benchmark datasets demonstrate that our HIH can achieve state-of-the-art results. In particular, our HIH reaches 4.08 NME (Normalized Mean Error) on WFLW, and 3.21 on COFW, which exceeds previous methods by a significant margin.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Face Alignment | 300W | HIH | NME_inter-ocular (%, Challenge) | 4.89 | #12 of 48 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | 300W | HIH | NME_inter-ocular (%, Common) | 2.65 | #12 of 48 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | 300W | HIH | NME_inter-ocular (%, Full) | 3.09 | #12 of 48 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | COFW | HIH | NME (inter-ocular) | 3.21% | #7 of 28 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | WFLW | HIH | AUC@10 (inter-ocular) | 60.5 | #7 of 36 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | WFLW | HIH | FR@10 (inter-ocular) | 2.60 | #7 of 36 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | WFLW | HIH | NME (inter-ocular) | 4.08 | #7 of 36 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | WFW (Extra Data) | HIH | AUC@10 (inter-ocular) | 60.50 | #4 of 11 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | WFW (Extra Data) | HIH | FR@10 (inter-ocular) | 2.60 | #4 of 11 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Face Alignment | WFW (Extra Data) | HIH | NME (inter-ocular) | 4.08 | #4 of 11 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections