Papers › Highly-Efficient Incomplete Large-Scale Multi-View Clustering With Consensus Bipartite Graph
Highly-Efficient Incomplete Large-Scale Multi-View Clustering With Consensus Bipartite Graph
Siwei Wang, Xinwang Liu, Li Liu, Wenxuan Tu, Xinzhong Zhu, Jiyuan Liu, Sihang Zhou, En Zhu
Multi-view clustering has received increasing attention due to its effectiveness in fusing complementary information without manual annotations. Most previous methods hold the assumption that each instance appears in all views. However, it is not uncommon to see that some views may contain some missing instances, which gives rise to incomplete multi-view clustering (IMVC) in literature. Although many IMVC methods have been recently proposed, they always encounter high complexity and expensive time expenditure from being applied into large-scale tasks. In this paper, we present a flexible highly-efficient incomplete large-scale multi-view clustering approach based on bipartite graph framework to solve these issues. Specifically, we formalize multi-view anchor learning and incomplete bipartite graph into a unified framework, which coordinates with each other to boost cluster performance. By introducing the flexible bipartite graph framework to handle IMVC for the first practice, our proposed method enjoys linear complexity respecting to instance numbers, which is more applicable for large-scale IMVC tasks. Comprehensive experimental results on various benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed algorithm against other IMVC competitors.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections