Papers › High-Dimensional Sparse Single-Index Regression Via Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion
High-Dimensional Sparse Single-Index Regression Via Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion
Runxiong Wu, Chang Deng, Xin Chen
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) has recently been used in the field of single-index models to estimate the directions. Compared with some other well-established methods, it requires relatively weaker conditions. However, its performance has not yet been studied in the high-dimensional scenario, where the number of covariates is much larger than the sample size. In this article, we propose a new efficient sparse estimate in HSIC based single-index model. This new method estimates the subspace spanned by the linear combinations of the covariates directly and performs variable selection simultaneously. Due to the non-convexity of the objective function, we use a majorize-minimize approach together with the linearized alternating direction method of multipliers algorithm to solve the optimization problem. The algorithm does not involve the inverse of the covariance matrix and therefore can handle the large p small n scenario naturally. Through extensive simulation studies and a real data analysis, we show our proposal is efficient and effective in the high-dimensional setting. The Matlab codes for this method are available online.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections