Papers › Hierarchical Multidimensional Scaling for the Comparison of Musical Performance Styles
Hierarchical Multidimensional Scaling for the Comparison of Musical Performance Styles
Anna K. Yanchenko, Peter D. Hoff
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Quantification of stylistic differences between musical artists is of academic interest to the music community, and is also useful for other applications such as music information retrieval and recommendation systems. Information about stylistic differences can be obtained by comparing the performances of different artists across common musical pieces. In this article, we develop a statistical methodology for identifying and quantifying systematic stylistic differences among artists that are consistent across audio recordings of a common set of pieces, in terms of several musical features. Our focus is on a comparison of ten different orchestras, based on data from audio recordings of the nine Beethoven symphonies. As generative or fully parametric models of raw audio data can be highly complex, and more complex than necessary for our goal of identifying differences between orchestras, we propose to reduce the data from a set of audio recordings down to pairwise distances between orchestras, based on different musical characteristics of the recordings, such as tempo, dynamics, and timbre. For each of these characteristics, we obtain multiple pairwise distance matrices, one for each movement of each symphony. We develop a hierarchical multidimensional scaling (HMDS) model to identify and quantify systematic differences between orchestras in terms of these three musical characteristics, and interpret the results in the context of known qualitative information about the orchestras. This methodology is able to recover several expected systematic similarities between orchestras, as well as to identify some more novel results. For example, we find that modern recordings exhibit a high degree of similarity to each other, as compared to older recordings.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections