Papers › Heterogeneous CPU+GPU Stochastic Gradient Descent Algorithms

Heterogeneous CPU+GPU Stochastic Gradient Descent Algorithms

19 Apr 2020arXiv:2004.08771archive 2025-07-28

Yujing Ma, Florin Rusu

The widely-adopted practice is to train deep learning models with specialized hardware accelerators, e.g., GPUs or TPUs, due to their superior performance on linear algebra operations. However, this strategy does not employ effectively the extensive CPU and memory resources -- which are used only for preprocessing, data transfer, and scheduling -- available by default on the accelerated servers. In this paper, we study training algorithms for deep learning on heterogeneous CPU+GPU architectures. Our two-fold objective -- maximize convergence rate and resource utilization simultaneously -- makes the problem challenging. In order to allow for a principled exploration of the design space, we first introduce a generic deep learning framework that exploits the difference in computational power and memory hierarchy between CPU and GPU through asynchronous message passing. Based on insights gained through experimentation with the framework, we design two heterogeneous asynchronous stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms. The first algorithm -- CPU+GPU Hogbatch -- combines small batches on CPU with large batches on GPU in order to maximize the utilization of both resources. However, this generates an unbalanced model update distribution which hinders the statistical convergence. The second algorithm -- Adaptive Hogbatch -- assigns batches with continuously evolving size based on the relative speed of CPU and GPU. This balances the model updates ratio at the expense of a customizable decrease in utilization. We show that the implementation of these algorithms in the proposed CPU+GPU framework achieves both faster convergence and higher resource utilization than TensorFlow on several real datasets and on two computing architectures -- an on-premises server and a cloud instance.

PaperPDFCode

Code

YMA33/CPU-GPU-SGD officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Deep LearningScheduling

2 archive task tags without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

SPEED

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections