Papers › Beyond Random Augmentations: Pretraining with Hard Views
Beyond Random Augmentations: Pretraining with Hard Views
Fabio Ferreira, Ivo Rapant, Jörg K. H. Franke, Frank Hutter
Many Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) methods aim for model invariance to different image augmentations known as views. To achieve this invariance, conventional approaches make use of random sampling operations within the image augmentation pipeline. We hypothesize that the efficacy of pretraining pipelines based on conventional random view sampling can be enhanced by explicitly selecting views that benefit the learning progress. A simple, yet effective approach is to select hard views that yield a higher loss. In this paper, we present Hard View Pretraining (HVP), a learning-free strategy that builds upon this hypothesis and extends random view generation. HVP exposes the model to harder, more challenging samples during SSL pretraining, which enhances downstream performance. It encompasses the following iterative steps: 1) randomly sample multiple views and forward each view through the pretrained model, 2) create pairs of two views and compute their loss, 3) adversarially select the pair yielding the highest loss depending on the current model state, and 4) run the backward pass with the selected pair. As a result, HVP achieves linear evaluation accuracy improvements of 1% on average on ImageNet for both 100 and 300 epoch pretraining and similar improvements on transfer tasks across DINO, SimSiam, iBOT, and SimCLR.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections