Papers › Hard-Aware Deeply Cascaded Embedding
Hard-Aware Deeply Cascaded Embedding
Yuhui Yuan, Kuiyuan Yang, Chao Zhang
Riding on the waves of deep neural networks, deep metric learning has also achieved promising results in various tasks using triplet network or Siamese network. Though the basic goal of making images from the same category closer than the ones from different categories is intuitive, it is hard to directly optimize due to the quadratic or cubic sample size. To solve the problem, hard example mining which only focuses on a subset of samples that are considered hard is widely used. However, hard is defined relative to a model, where complex models treat most samples as easy ones and vice versa for simple models, and both are not good for training. Samples are also with different hard levels, it is hard to define a model with the just right complexity and choose hard examples adequately. This motivates us to ensemble a set of models with different complexities in cascaded manner and mine hard examples adaptively, a sample is judged by a series of models with increasing complexities and only updates models that consider the sample as a hard case. We evaluate our method on CARS196, CUB-200-2011, Stanford Online Products, VehicleID and DeepFashion datasets. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods by a large margin.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Retrieval | SOP | HDC | R@1 | 69.5 | #14 of 14 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Metric Learning | CUB-200-2011 | HDC | R@1 | 60.7 | #25 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections