Papers › Handwritten Text Recognition from Crowdsourced Annotations
Handwritten Text Recognition from Crowdsourced Annotations
Solène Tarride, Tristan Faine, Mélodie Boillet, Harold Mouchère, Christopher Kermorvant
In this paper, we explore different ways of training a model for handwritten text recognition when multiple imperfect or noisy transcriptions are available. We consider various training configurations, such as selecting a single transcription, retaining all transcriptions, or computing an aggregated transcription from all available annotations. In addition, we evaluate the impact of quality-based data selection, where samples with low agreement are removed from the training set. Our experiments are carried out on municipal registers of the city of Belfort (France) written between 1790 and 1946. % results The results show that computing a consensus transcription or training on multiple transcriptions are good alternatives. However, selecting training samples based on the degree of agreement between annotators introduces a bias in the training data and does not improve the results. Our dataset is publicly available on Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/record/8041668.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Handwritten Text Recognition | Belfort | PyLaia (all transcriptions + agreement-based split) | CER (%) | 4.34 | #1 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Handwritten Text Recognition | Belfort | PyLaia (all transcriptions + agreement-based split) | WER (%) | 15.14 | #1 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Handwritten Text Recognition | Belfort | PyLaia (rover consensus + agreement-based split) | CER (%) | 4.95 | #2 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Handwritten Text Recognition | Belfort | PyLaia (rover consensus + agreement-based split) | WER (%) | 17.08 | #2 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Handwritten Text Recognition | Belfort | PyLaia (human transcriptions + agreement-based split) | CER (%) | 5.57 | #3 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Handwritten Text Recognition | Belfort | PyLaia (human transcriptions + agreement-based split) | WER (%) | 19.12 | #3 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Handwritten Text Recognition | Belfort | PyLaia (human transcriptions + random split) | CER (%) | 10.54 | #4 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Handwritten Text Recognition | Belfort | PyLaia (human transcriptions + random split) | WER (%) | 28.11 | #4 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections