Papers › HamilToniQ: An Open-Source Benchmark Toolkit for Quantum Computers
HamilToniQ: An Open-Source Benchmark Toolkit for Quantum Computers
Xiaotian Xu, Kuan-Cheng Chen, Robert Wille
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
In this paper, we introduce HamilToniQ, an open-source, and application-oriented benchmarking toolkit for the comprehensive evaluation of Quantum Processing Units (QPUs). Designed to navigate the complexities of quantum computations, HamilToniQ incorporates a methodological framework assessing QPU types, topologies, and multi-QPU systems. The toolkit facilitates the evaluation of QPUs' performance through multiple steps including quantum circuit compilation and quantum error mitigation (QEM), integrating strategies that are unique to each stage. HamilToniQ's standardized score, H-Score, quantifies the fidelity and reliability of QPUs, providing a multidimensional perspective of QPU performance. With a focus on the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), the toolkit enables direct, comparable analysis of QPUs, enhancing transparency and equity in benchmarking. Demonstrated in this paper, HamilToniQ has been validated on various IBM QPUs, affirming its effectiveness and robustness. Overall, HamilToniQ significantly contributes to the advancement of the quantum computing field by offering precise and equitable benchmarking metrics.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections