Papers › Guiding Generation for Abstractive Text Summarization Based on Key Information Guide Network
Guiding Generation for Abstractive Text Summarization Based on Key Information Guide Network
Chenliang Li, Weiran Xu, Si Li, Sheng Gao
Neural network models, based on the attentional encoder-decoder model, have good capability in abstractive text summarization. However, these models are hard to be controlled in the process of generation, which leads to a lack of key information. We propose a guiding generation model that combines the extractive method and the abstractive method. Firstly, we obtain keywords from the text by a extractive model. Then, we introduce a Key Information Guide Network (KIGN), which encodes the keywords to the key information representation, to guide the process of generation. In addition, we use a prediction-guide mechanism, which can obtain the long-term value for future decoding, to further guide the summary generation. We evaluate our model on the CNN/Daily Mail dataset. The experimental results show that our model leads to significant improvements.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Text Summarization | CNN / Daily Mail (Anonymized) | KIGN+Prediction-guide | ROUGE-1 | 38.95 | #10 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text Summarization | CNN / Daily Mail (Anonymized) | KIGN+Prediction-guide | ROUGE-2 | 17.12 | #10 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Text Summarization | CNN / Daily Mail (Anonymized) | KIGN+Prediction-guide | ROUGE-L | 35.68 | #10 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections