Papers › Guided AbsoluteGrad: Magnitude of Gradients Matters to Explanation's Localization and Saliency

Guided AbsoluteGrad: Magnitude of Gradients Matters to Explanation's Localization and Saliency

23 Apr 2024arXiv:2404.15564archive 2025-07-28

Jun Huang, Yan Liu

This paper proposes a new gradient-based XAI method called Guided AbsoluteGrad for saliency map explanations. We utilize both positive and negative gradient magnitudes and employ gradient variance to distinguish the important areas for noise deduction. We also introduce a novel evaluation metric named ReCover And Predict (RCAP), which considers the Localization and Visual Noise Level objectives of the explanations. We propose two propositions for these two objectives and prove the necessity of evaluating them. We evaluate Guided AbsoluteGrad with seven gradient-based XAI methods using the RCAP metric and other SOTA metrics in three case studies: (1) ImageNet dataset with ResNet50 model; (2) International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) dataset with EfficientNet model; (3) the Places365 dataset with DenseNet161 model. Our method surpasses other gradient-based approaches, showcasing the quality of enhanced saliency map explanations through gradient magnitude.

PaperPDFCode

Code

youyinnn/guided-absolutegrad officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

1x1 ConvolutionAverage PoolingBatch NormalizationConvolutionDense ConnectionsDepthwise ConvolutionDepthwise Separable ConvolutionDropoutEfficientNetInverted Residual BlockPointwise ConvolutionRMSPropReLUSigmoid ActivationSqueeze-and-Excitation Block

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections