Papers › Group-aware Contrastive Regression for Action Quality Assessment

Group-aware Contrastive Regression for Action Quality Assessment

17 Aug 2021ICCV 2021 10arXiv:2108.07797archive 2025-07-28

Xumin Yu, Yongming Rao, Wenliang Zhao, Jiwen Lu, Jie zhou

Assessing action quality is challenging due to the subtle differences between videos and large variations in scores. Most existing approaches tackle this problem by regressing a quality score from a single video, suffering a lot from the large inter-video score variations. In this paper, we show that the relations among videos can provide important clues for more accurate action quality assessment during both training and inference. Specifically, we reformulate the problem of action quality assessment as regressing the relative scores with reference to another video that has shared attributes (e.g., category and difficulty), instead of learning unreferenced scores. Following this formulation, we propose a new Contrastive Regression (CoRe) framework to learn the relative scores by pair-wise comparison, which highlights the differences between videos and guides the models to learn the key hints for assessment. In order to further exploit the relative information between two videos, we devise a group-aware regression tree to convert the conventional score regression into two easier sub-problems: coarse-to-fine classification and regression in small intervals. To demonstrate the effectiveness of CoRe, we conduct extensive experiments on three mainstream AQA datasets including AQA-7, MTL-AQA and JIGSAWS. Our approach outperforms previous methods by a large margin and establishes new state-of-the-art on all three benchmarks.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2108.07797")

Code

Syntology Ran 1 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran with no contract checked.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 1 sample from 1 repository, 1 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

yuxumin/CoRe mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 1 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran

Licence: 1 of the 1 sample is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from yuxumin/CoRe. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Group_helper yuxumin/CoRe/utils/Group_helper.py community (archive-listed) ran no licence file found · pointer only · f323a0a51fc3e74b · report

Tasks

Action Quality Assessmentregression

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Action Quality Assessment AQA-7 CoRe RL2(*100) 2.12 #2 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Action Quality Assessment AQA-7 CoRe Spearman Correlation 84.01% #2 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Action Quality Assessment AQA-7 I3D+MLP RL2(*100) 3.20 #5 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Action Quality Assessment AQA-7 I3D+MLP Spearman Correlation 76.01% #5 of 9 Archive leaderboard report
Action Quality Assessment MTL-AQA CoRe(w/ DD) RL2(*100) 0.260 #6 of 21 Archive leaderboard report
Action Quality Assessment MTL-AQA CoRe(w/ DD) Spearman Correlation 95.12 #6 of 21 Archive leaderboard report
Action Quality Assessment MTL-AQA I3D+MLP(w/ DD) RL2(*100) 0.394 #8 of 21 Archive leaderboard report
Action Quality Assessment MTL-AQA I3D+MLP(w/ DD) Spearman Correlation 93.81 #8 of 21 Archive leaderboard report
Action Quality Assessment MTL-AQA CoRe RL2(*100) 0.365 #9 of 21 Archive leaderboard report
Action Quality Assessment MTL-AQA CoRe Spearman Correlation 93.41 #9 of 21 Archive leaderboard report
Action Quality Assessment MTL-AQA I3D+MLP RL2(*100) 0.465 #14 of 21 Archive leaderboard report
Action Quality Assessment MTL-AQA I3D+MLP Spearman Correlation 91.96 #14 of 21 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections