Papers › Grounding Psychological Shape Space in Convolutional Neural Networks

Grounding Psychological Shape Space in Convolutional Neural Networks

16 Nov 2021arXiv:2111.08409archive 2025-07-28

Lucas Bechberger, Kai-Uwe Kühnberger

Shape information is crucial for human perception and cognition, and should therefore also play a role in cognitive AI systems. We employ the interdisciplinary framework of conceptual spaces, which proposes a geometric representation of conceptual knowledge through low-dimensional interpretable similarity spaces. These similarity spaces are often based on psychological dissimilarity ratings for a small set of stimuli, which are then transformed into a spatial representation by a technique called multidimensional scaling. Unfortunately, this approach is incapable of generalizing to novel stimuli. In this paper, we use convolutional neural networks to learn a generalizable mapping between perceptual inputs (pixels of grayscale line drawings) and a recently proposed psychological similarity space for the shape domain. We investigate different network architectures (classification network vs. autoencoder) and different training regimes (transfer learning vs. multi-task learning). Our results indicate that a classification-based multi-task learning scenario yields the best results, but that its performance is relatively sensitive to the dimensionality of the similarity space.

PaperPDFCode

Code

lbechberger/LearningPsychologicalSpaces officialmentioned in papertfNOASSERTION report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Multi-Task LearningTransfer Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections