Papers › GreenMachine: Automatic Design of Zero-Cost Proxies for Energy-Efficient NAS
GreenMachine: Automatic Design of Zero-Cost Proxies for Energy-Efficient NAS
22 Nov 2024arXiv:2411.15290archive 2025-07-28
Gabriel Cortês, Nuno Lourenço, Penousal Machado
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has driven innovations and created new opportunities across various sectors. However, leveraging domain-specific knowledge often requires automated tools to design and configure models effectively. In the case of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), researchers and practitioners usually resort to Neural Architecture Search (NAS) approaches, which are resource- and time-intensive, requiring the training and evaluation of numerous candidate architectures. This raises sustainability concerns, particularly due to the high energy demands involved, creating a paradox: the pursuit of the most effective model can undermine sustainability goals. To mitigate this issue, zero-cost proxies have emerged as a promising alternative. These proxies estimate a model's performance without the need for full training, offering a more efficient approach. This paper addresses the challenges of model evaluation by automatically designing zero-cost proxies to assess DNNs efficiently. Our method begins with a randomly generated set of zero-cost proxies, which are evolved and tested using the NATS-Bench benchmark. We assess the proxies' effectiveness using both randomly sampled and stratified subsets of the search space, ensuring they can differentiate between low- and high-performing networks and enhance generalizability. Results show our method outperforms existing approaches on the stratified sampling strategy, achieving strong correlations with ground truth performance, including a Kendall correlation of 0.89 on CIFAR-10 and 0.77 on CIFAR-100 with NATS-Bench-SSS and a Kendall correlation of 0.78 on CIFAR-10 and 0.71 on CIFAR-100 with NATS-Bench-TSS.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-10 |
GreenMachine-3 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.888 |
#1 of 5 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-10 |
GreenMachine-3 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.982 |
#1 of 5 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-10 |
GreenMachine-2 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.827 |
#2 of 5 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-10 |
GreenMachine-2 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.958 |
#2 of 5 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-10 |
GreenMachine-1 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.619 |
#3 of 5 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-10 |
GreenMachine-1 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.816 |
#3 of 5 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-100 |
GreenMachine-2 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.769 |
#1 of 5 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-100 |
GreenMachine-2 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.924 |
#1 of 5 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-100 |
GreenMachine-3 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.744 |
#2 of 5 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-100 |
GreenMachine-3 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.9 |
#2 of 5 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-100 |
GreenMachine-1 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.653 |
#3 of 5 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, CIFAR-100 |
GreenMachine-1 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.847 |
#3 of 5 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, ImageNet16-120 |
GreenMachine-2 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.856 |
#1 of 4 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, ImageNet16-120 |
GreenMachine-2 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.971 |
#1 of 4 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, ImageNet16-120 |
GreenMachine-3 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.794 |
#2 of 4 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, ImageNet16-120 |
GreenMachine-3 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.942 |
#2 of 4 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, ImageNet16-120 |
GreenMachine-1 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.676 |
#3 of 4 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Size, ImageNet16-120 |
GreenMachine-1 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.868 |
#3 of 4 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-10 |
GreenMachine-1 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.783 |
#9 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-10 |
GreenMachine-1 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.928 |
#9 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-10 |
GreenMachine-2 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.655 |
#10 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-10 |
GreenMachine-2 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.831 |
#10 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-10 |
GreenMachine-3 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.391 |
#11 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-10 |
GreenMachine-3 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.578 |
#11 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-100 |
GreenMachine-1 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.705 |
#9 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-100 |
GreenMachine-1 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.873 |
#9 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-100 |
GreenMachine-2 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.558 |
#10 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-100 |
GreenMachine-2 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.741 |
#10 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-100 |
GreenMachine-3 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.296 |
#11 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, CIFAR-100 |
GreenMachine-3 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.448 |
#11 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, ImageNet16-120 |
GreenMachine-1 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.643 |
#9 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, ImageNet16-120 |
GreenMachine-1 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.827 |
#9 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, ImageNet16-120 |
GreenMachine-3 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.57 |
#10 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, ImageNet16-120 |
GreenMachine-3 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.748 |
#10 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, ImageNet16-120 |
GreenMachine-2 |
Kendall's Tau |
0.558 |
#11 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Neural Architecture Search |
NATS-Bench Topology, ImageNet16-120 |
GreenMachine-2 |
Spearman's Rho |
0.733 |
#11 of 11 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections