Papers › Greedy Shapley Client Selection for Communication-Efficient Federated Learning

Greedy Shapley Client Selection for Communication-Efficient Federated Learning

14 Dec 2023arXiv:2312.09108archive 2025-07-28

Pranava Singhal, Shashi Raj Pandey, Petar Popovski

The standard client selection algorithms for Federated Learning (FL) are often unbiased and involve uniform random sampling of clients. This has been proven sub-optimal for fast convergence under practical settings characterized by significant heterogeneity in data distribution, computing, and communication resources across clients. For applications having timing constraints due to limited communication opportunities with the parameter server (PS), the client selection strategy is critical to complete model training within the fixed budget of communication rounds. To address this, we develop a biased client selection strategy, GreedyFed, that identifies and greedily selects the most contributing clients in each communication round. This method builds on a fast approximation algorithm for the Shapley Value at the PS, making the computation tractable for real-world applications with many clients. Compared to various client selection strategies on several real-world datasets, GreedyFed demonstrates fast and stable convergence with high accuracy under timing constraints and when imposing a higher degree of heterogeneity in data distribution, systems constraints, and privacy requirements.

PaperPDFCode

Code

pringlesinghal/greedyfed officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Federated Learning

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections