Papers › Graph-based Person Signature for Person Re-Identifications
Graph-based Person Signature for Person Re-Identifications
Binh X. Nguyen, Binh D. Nguyen, Tuong Do, Erman Tjiputra, Quang D. Tran, Anh Nguyen
The task of person re-identification (ReID) is to match images of the same person over multiple non-overlapping camera views. Due to the variations in visual factors, previous works have investigated how the person identity, body parts, and attributes benefit the person ReID problem. However, the correlations between attributes, body parts, and within each attribute are not fully utilized. In this paper, we propose a new method to effectively aggregate detailed person descriptions (attributes labels) and visual features (body parts and global features) into a graph, namely Graph-based Person Signature, and utilize Graph Convolutional Networks to learn the topological structure of the visual signature of a person. The graph is integrated into a multi-branch multi-task framework for person re-identification. The extensive experiments are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach on two large-scale datasets, including Market-1501 and DukeMTMC-ReID. Our approach achieves competitive results among the state of the art and outperforms other attribute-based or mask-guided methods.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2104.06770")
Code
Syntology Ran 5 of 10 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 4 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 10 samples from 1 repository, 5 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
10 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 10 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from aioz-ai/CVPRW21_GPS. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
dd1114865f06f0fd · report
c83d9f7fca950b77 · report
3c707eafb83ce730 · report
e3b2a83f52101f2d · report
7d6e263caea8e963 · report
7817df1615c1662c · report
24239cfdb69cc320 · report
cc69cbf26e50f6a5 · report
93f2c0b80ea7f36e · report
9dbfd6698248b414 · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Person Re-Identification | DukeMTMC-reID | GPS (without re-ranking) | Rank-1 | 88.2 | #52 of 94 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Person Re-Identification | DukeMTMC-reID | GPS (without re-ranking) | Rank-10 | 96.7 | #52 of 94 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Person Re-Identification | DukeMTMC-reID | GPS (without re-ranking) | Rank-5 | 95.2 | #52 of 94 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Person Re-Identification | DukeMTMC-reID | GPS (without re-ranking) | mAP | 78.7 | #52 of 94 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Person Re-Identification | Market-1501 | GPS (without re-ranking) | Rank-1 | 95.2 | #66 of 135 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Person Re-Identification | Market-1501 | GPS (without re-ranking) | Rank-5 | 98.4 | #66 of 135 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Person Re-Identification | Market-1501 | GPS (without re-ranking) | mAP | 87.8 | #66 of 135 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections