Papers › Gradient Sampling Methods with Inexact Subproblem Solutions and Gradient Aggregation
Gradient Sampling Methods with Inexact Subproblem Solutions and Gradient Aggregation
Frank E. Curtis, Minhan Li
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Gradient sampling (GS) has proved to be an effective methodology for the minimization of objective functions that may be nonconvex and/or nonsmooth. The most computationally expensive component of a contemporary GS method is the need to solve a convex quadratic subproblem in each iteration. In this paper, a strategy is proposed that allows the use of inexact solutions of these subproblems, which, as proved in the paper, can be incorporated without the loss of theoretical convergence guarantees. Numerical experiments show that by exploiting inexact subproblem solutions, one can consistently reduce the computational effort required by a GS method. Additionally, a strategy is proposed for aggregating gradient information after a subproblem is solved (potentially inexactly), as has been exploited in bundle methods for nonsmooth optimization. It is proved that the aggregation scheme can be introduced without the loss of theoretical convergence guarantees. Numerical experiments show that incorporating this gradient aggregation approach substantially reduces the computational effort required by a GS method.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections