Papers › Gradient Harmonized Single-stage Detector

Gradient Harmonized Single-stage Detector

13 Nov 2018arXiv:1811.05181archive 2025-07-28

Buyu Li, Yu Liu, Xiaogang Wang

Despite the great success of two-stage detectors, single-stage detector is still a more elegant and efficient way, yet suffers from the two well-known disharmonies during training, i.e. the huge difference in quantity between positive and negative examples as well as between easy and hard examples. In this work, we first point out that the essential effect of the two disharmonies can be summarized in term of the gradient. Further, we propose a novel gradient harmonizing mechanism (GHM) to be a hedging for the disharmonies. The philosophy behind GHM can be easily embedded into both classification loss function like cross-entropy (CE) and regression loss function like smooth-L₁ (SL₁) loss. To this end, two novel loss functions called GHM-C and GHM-R are designed to balancing the gradient flow for anchor classification and bounding box refinement, respectively. Ablation study on MS COCO demonstrates that without laborious hyper-parameter tuning, both GHM-C and GHM-R can bring substantial improvement for single-stage detector. Without any whistles and bells, our model achieves 41.6 mAP on COCO test-dev set which surpasses the state-of-the-art method, Focal Loss (FL) + SL₁, by 0.8.

PaperPDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1811.05181")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 1 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 1 sample from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

libuyu/GHM_Detection officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report
ForrestPi/GHM_Loss mentioned on GitHubtf report
GXYM/GHM_Loss mentioned on GitHubtf report
JennyVanessa/Paddle-GHM mentioned on GitHubpaddle report
peteryuX/tensorflow-GHM-loss mentioned on GitHubtfMIT report
thisisi3/Paddle-GHM mentioned on GitHubpaddle report
tsdlrh/GHM_paddle mentioned on GitHubpaddle report
xialuxi/GHMLoss-caffe mentioned on GitHub report
open-mmlab/mmdetection pytorchApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

1 sample harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1unverified

Licence: 0 of the 1 sample are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from peteryuX/tensorflow-GHM-loss. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_ghm_weight peteryuX/tensorflow-GHM-loss/tf_ghm_loss.py community (archive-listed) unverified MIT (permissive) · 82c7307b9b20ffee · report

Tasks

General ClassificationObject DetectionPhilosophy

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Object Detection COCO minival GHM-C + GHM-R (RetinaNet-FPN-ResNet-50, M=30) AP50 55.5 #207 of 220 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO minival GHM-C + GHM-R (RetinaNet-FPN-ResNet-50, M=30) AP75 38.1 #207 of 220 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO minival GHM-C + GHM-R (RetinaNet-FPN-ResNet-50, M=30) APL 46.7 #207 of 220 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO minival GHM-C + GHM-R (RetinaNet-FPN-ResNet-50, M=30) APM 39.6 #207 of 220 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO minival GHM-C + GHM-R (RetinaNet-FPN-ResNet-50, M=30) APS 19.6 #207 of 220 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO minival GHM-C + GHM-R (RetinaNet-FPN-ResNet-50, M=30) box AP 35.8 #207 of 220 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO test-dev GHM-C + GHM-R (RetinaNet-FPN-ResNeXt-101) AP50 62.8 #181 of 225 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO test-dev GHM-C + GHM-R (RetinaNet-FPN-ResNeXt-101) AP75 44.2 #181 of 225 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO test-dev GHM-C + GHM-R (RetinaNet-FPN-ResNeXt-101) APL 55.3 #181 of 225 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO test-dev GHM-C + GHM-R (RetinaNet-FPN-ResNeXt-101) APM 45.1 #181 of 225 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO test-dev GHM-C + GHM-R (RetinaNet-FPN-ResNeXt-101) APS 22.3 #181 of 225 Archive leaderboard report
Object Detection COCO test-dev GHM-C + GHM-R (RetinaNet-FPN-ResNeXt-101) box mAP 41.6 #181 of 225 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Introduced by this paper: GHM-C, GHM-R

1x1 ConvolutionAverage PoolingBatch NormalizationBottleneck Residual BlockConvolutionFocal LossGHM-CGHM-RGlobal Average PoolingGrouped ConvolutionKaiming InitializationMax PoolingReLUResNeXtResNeXt BlockResidual BlockResidual Connection

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections