Papers › Goldfish: Peer selection using Matrix completion in unstructured P2P network
Goldfish: Peer selection using Matrix completion in unstructured P2P network
Bowen Xue, Yifan Mao, Shaileshh Bojja Venkatakrishnan, Sreeram Kannan
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Peer-to-peer (P2P) networks underlie a variety of decentralized paradigms including blockchains, distributed file storage and decentralized domain name systems. A central primitive in P2P networks is the peer selection algorithm, which decides how a node should select a fixed number of neighbors to connect with. In this paper, we consider the design of a peer-selection algorithm for unstructured P2P networks with the goal of minimizing the broadcast latency. We propose Goldfish, a novel solution that dynamically decides the neighbor set by exploiting the past experiences as well as exploring new neighbors. The key technical contributions come from bringing ideas of matrix completion for estimating message delivery times for every possible message for every peer ever connected, and a streaming algorithm to efficiently perform the estimation while achieving good performance. The matrix completion interpolates the delivery times to all virtual connections in order to select the best combination of neighbors. Goldfish employs a streaming algorithm that only uses a short recent memory to finish matrix interpolation. When the number of publishing source is equal to a node's maximal number of connections, Goldfish found the global optimal solution with 92.7% probability by exploring every node only once. In more complex situations where nodes are publishing based on exponential distribution and adjusting connection in real time, we compare Goldfish with a baseline peer selection system, and show Goldfish saves approximately 14.5% less time under real world geolocation and propagation latency.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections